World
at last taking threat seriously, despite Bush 10/12/2005
- International — "How often does one walk into one
of these things and come out at the end of it at 6 in
the morning with just about everything you asked for coming
in? Not very often." That was Greenpeace climate
campaigner Steve Sawyer's reaction at the end of the Climate
summit in Montreal.
“The Kyoto Protocol is stronger today than it was two
weeks ago. This historic first Meeting of the Parties
has acknowledged the urgency of the threat that climate
change poses to the world’s poorest people, and eventually,
to all of us. The decisions made here have cleared the
way for long term action,” said Bill Hare, Greenpeace
International Climate Policy Advisor in Montreal.
The meeting agreed the following:
--To start urgent negotiations on
a new round of emission reduction targets for the second
commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (2013-2017). A
special group has been established to ensure that these
negotiations are concluded “as soon as possible”. This
is necessary to ensure the continuity of carbon markets,
and to allow governments to put policies and measures
in place to ensure that the new, deeper emission reduction
targets are met
--To start now to review and improve
the Kyoto Protocol. Mandated under the existing treaty,
this review will formally begin at next year’s meeting.
--A Five Year Plan of Action on Adaptation,
to assist least developed countries to cope with the impacts
of climate change. This programme will begin to address
the fact that climate change already impacts the world’s
poorest, and that it will get much worse in the coming
decades. It is the ethical, political, and legal responsibility
of the industrialised countries to provide for this.
As expected, the Bush administration
attempted to derail the process, at one point even walking
out of the negotiations, but the rest of the world showed
a resolve to move ahead regardless. For once, the Bush
administration was forced back to the table and into agreement
with the international community. No doubt the overwhelming
presence of U.S. civil society at these talks has had
a positive effect.
The US has continued to attempt to
lure countries away from the UN multilateral climate regime
with its international emission trading to an ineffective
approach based on voluntary actions and ‘partnerships’.
Today, however, governments have agreed to hold substantive
talks beginning in May 2006 on the Kyoto Protocol’s second
commitment period, sending an unmistakable signal that
we are on the road to new and more ambitious targets.
According to Sawyer, "What will
be remembered is that this was the moment when the future
of the Kyoto Protocol and legally binding emissions reductions
and the cap and trade system was secured...Australia and
the US are isolated as never before, and the overwhelming
presence of US state governments, cities, trade unions,
businesses, churches, youth and many other parts of civil
society gave the rest of the world confidence that Americans
do care about climate change, and that the Bush administration's
intransigence will sooner rather than later be remembered
as an unfortunate historical footnote." |